Skip to content

Firestopping

Wood-frame, steel and concrete: match firestops to the complete assembly

By Review.LivePublished 3 min readHow we write

A crew experienced on concrete towers moves to a wood-frame rental building. Its familiar drain-pipe detail refers to a concrete floor. The foreman needs to compare the actual complete floor-ceiling assembly and service arrangement before ordering components.

An unoccupied timber apartment building under construction shows repeated wall bays and roof framing against a forested hillside.
Photo: Marek Ślusarczyk on Wikimedia Commons · Wood frame condominium construction in Canada – apartment building construction in Fernie, British Columbia · CC BY 3.0 · Cropped, resized, colour adjusted and sharpened.

Start with the actual assembly and complete applicable system, not the building’s broad material label. Wood-frame, steel and concrete projects can present different receiving construction and interfaces; even two wood floors may be different rated assemblies. A familiar pipe size or sealant does not establish that a concrete-floor detail applies to a wood floor-ceiling construction. Resolve the complete match before installation.

Compare the assembly before reusing the method

  1. Identify the complete receiving construction. Gather the current design reference and actual floor or wall components, layers and interfaces through competent review. Distinguish the structural material from the complete protection assembly. An exposed plywood surface or a concrete-looking face does not alone establish the applicable fire-resistance construction or the permitted penetration configuration.
  2. Read the specific permitted arrangement. STI F-C-2020, for example, links particular floor-ceiling designs with its flooring, ceiling, service and device provisions. That dated example illustrates a complete assembly comparison; it is not a recommendation for every wood building or proof of current acceptance in your jurisdiction. Obtain the applicable current configuration and required review for the actual project.
  3. Coordinate separate protection and movement questions. Ask the responsible team about relevant structural movement, supports, interfaces and cavity-protection tasks. Keep fire blocking, penetrations, joint protection and other specified work identifiable rather than assuming one material or one trade finishes every task. Refer uncertain requirements to the qualified reviewer; this lesson does not calculate wood shrinkage or provide a cavity-blocking design.
  4. Check the first actual condition and later changes. Coordinate receiving checks, installer access and required examination before repeating the arrangement. Record unmatched components or geometry and obtain the proper response. A successful first location does not authorize later changes in framing, layers, services or receiving surfaces; compare those differences against the complete accepted references.

Common mistakes

  • Selecting from the building’s broad material label alone.
  • Transferring a concrete-floor detail to a different complete assembly.
  • Treating all cavity and penetration protection as one interchangeable task.

Checklist

Check the receiving assembly, not only the pipe

  • Actual complete construction and current reference.
  • Permitted service and component configuration.
  • Required jurisdictional and project review.
  • Separate movement and protection interfaces.
  • Initial verification and later-change checks.

Check your understanding

The same drain-pipe size is used on both jobs. Can its concrete-floor firestop detail be reused in a wood floor?

Show the answer
Compare the complete receiving assembly and actual service configuration with an applicable accepted system. Pipe size alone does not establish permission to transfer the construction or component arrangement.

Sources

  1. F-C-2020: specific floor-ceiling and nonmetallic penetration arrangementSpecified Technologies Inc. · Dated 2014 specific example; current complete requirements and review govern · accessed