Skip to content

Difficult conversations

Giving direct feedback to a foreman without starting a fight

By Review.LivePublished 3 min readHow we write

The electrical foreman catches you in the hallway after Thursday's coordination meeting. Your framing foreman told him, in front of everyone, that the corridor delay was "your problem, not ours" and walked out before the sequence was agreed. It is the third story like it this month, and he is also the fastest foreman you have.

Two men in hard hats and high-visibility vests go over a document together in a fabrication shop.
Photo: Ana Lucia Videira on Unsplash

Feedback turns into a fight when it sounds like a verdict on the person — "you're rude", "you're not a team player" — because the only answer to a verdict is a defence. The situation–behaviour–impact model gives the foreman something concrete instead: when and where, what he did, and what it caused. Its extension adds a question about intent, which matters on site because the reason is often something you did not know.

  1. Choose the moment: soon, in private, not at the end of a bad day and never in front of the crew. If the behaviour is unsafe, stop the work first and talk after.
  2. Name the situation precisely: "Thursday's coordination meeting, when the corridor came up."
  3. Describe the behaviour as a camera would record it: "You said the delay was his problem and left before we agreed the sequence."
  4. Describe the impact on the job: "We lost a day on that decision, and the electrician took it to the owner's representative."
  5. Ask about intent, then listen: "What was going on there?"
  6. Agree one change and a check, and say so when you see it happen.

The conversation, in short

  1. You:In Thursday's coordination meeting, you told the electrical foreman the delay was his problem and left before we'd agreed the sequence. We lost a day on it. What was going on there?
  2. Foreman:He's been blaming my crew for two weeks. I was done hearing it.
  3. You:I didn't know that, and I'll deal with the blaming. But I need you to stay till the decision's made, even when it gets heated. Can you do that?
  4. Foreman:Yeah. As long as the blaming stops.

Common mistakes

  • Giving it in front of the crew, where he has to win.
  • Saying "always" or "never", which starts an argument about the exceptions.
  • Judging character instead of describing what happened.
  • Saving months of complaints for one conversation.

Checklist

Before you talk to them

  • One situation, with the day and the place
  • The behaviour, in words a camera could record
  • The impact on the job and the team
  • A question about their intent
  • One change and a date to check it
  • A plan to notice the improvement

Check your understanding

Why describe the behaviour instead of telling the foreman what you think of his attitude?

Show the answer
A behaviour can be seen, agreed and changed; an attitude can only be denied. "You left before the decision" gives him something to fix, while "you have an attitude problem" gives him something to defend. It also keeps you fair, because you are judging what happened rather than who he is.

Sources

  1. Use Situation-Behavior-Impact (SBI) to Understand IntentCenter for Creative Leadership · accessed
  • People around a conference table in a meeting, one man standing and another resting his head on his hand.

    Difficult conversations

    Keeping a heated site meeting productive

    Use ground rules, a parking lot and a clear close to keep a tense site meeting on decisions instead of blame, and know when to stop the meeting altogether.

    3 min read

  • A crew in yellow hard hats and orange and green mesh vests stands listening during a site briefing.

    Leadership and closeout

    Leading a crew through a hard week

    Keep a construction crew focused and safe through a high-pressure week with an honest Monday briefing, three priorities, planned long days and recognition.

    3 min read