Skip to content

Scheduling

Inspections and hold points in the schedule: activities with notice, not surprises

By Review.LivePublished 3 min readHow we write

The pour is booked, but the coordinator discovers that a required inspection has not been requested. The inspector also needs information that the team has not assembled. The programme shows placement followed by the next floor, with no release activity between them.

Exterior walls with spray foam between the studs around two windows, and drywall sheets leaning ready to close them in.
Photo: Olek Buzunov on Unsplash

Put required inspections and hold points into the work sequence before the activities they release. Show preparation, confirmed notice requirements, the inspection or test and the responsible release decision as distinguishable items. A booking alone does not prove the work can proceed. Use the project’s actual requirements and responsible authority’s current process; this lesson does not supply a universal notice period or authorize bypassing a hold point.

Schedule the work needed to obtain the release

  1. Find the applicable requirements. Review the inspection plan, specifications and relevant authority or consultant instructions with the responsible leads. Identify what must be checked and what later work depends on the result.
  2. Name the release authority. Record who performs the check and who confirms the resulting release. Where those are different people, make both roles visible so attendance is not confused with authorization.
  3. Confirm notice and supporting inputs. Ask the current responsible contact about booking requirements and information needed. Assign the person preparing drawings, test information or other requested material, and record unconfirmed timing as an assumption.
  4. Connect preparation and inspection to the sequence. Put the request and readiness actions before the check, and connect the required release before the dependent work. Use the confirmed timing rather than adding one generic inspection bar to the end of a package.
  5. Plan the response to an unresolved result. Identify who assesses corrections, obtains further information or arranges another check. Discuss schedule exposure without assuming the first inspection passes or inventing a standard reinspection duration.
  6. Read the upcoming checks in the look-ahead. Confirm requests, supporting inputs and work readiness with their owners. Update status from actual records and keep an open result visible until the authorized decision has been recorded.

Common mistakes

  • Booking the check without preparing its required inputs.
  • Showing attendance as the same status as authorized release.
  • Deleting a hold point to recover a date instead of resolving its dependency.

Checklist

Before the dependent work becomes firm

  • The requirement and affected work are identified.
  • Inspection and release roles are named.
  • Notice and information requirements are confirmed.
  • Preparation is linked before the check.
  • Unresolved results have owners and next actions.

Check your understanding

The inspector attended, but the result requires further information. Can the schedule mark the release complete?

Show the answer
Keep the required release open and record the missing information, responsible owner and next decision. Attendance is an event, while release is a separate confirmed condition. Update the dependent work from the authorized result rather than from the visit date alone.