Skip to content

Labour and productivity

What crew turnover costs and what keeps people: counting one departure and acting on it

By Review.LivePublished 3 min readHow we write

A contractor says every departure costs hundreds of hours, but has never separated recruitment, orientation and useful replacement work. Two recent leavers also mentioned late changes to weekend plans. The manager wants a defensible cost picture and a response based on actual feedback rather than an unsupported industry average.

Hands use a blue calculator at a desk beside a keyboard and coffee mug.
Photo: Towfiqu barbhuiya on Unsplash

Count this departure before applying a generic turnover multiplier. Record actual replacement activities, direct expenses and clearly labelled estimates for gaps that were not measured. Keep productive replacement work separate from additional support effort. A retention conversation can reveal a concern worth addressing; it does not establish the top causes for an industry or guarantee that the next person stays.

Make one cost record and one evidence-based response

  1. Define the departure and accounting boundary. State the role, period and activities being counted. Separate an ordinary replacement from changed project staffing or expansion. Agree with the responsible manager which hours and expenses belong in the comparison, rather than assigning every cost after the departure to that event.
  2. Collect actual additional effort. Record recruitment, administration, orientation and mentor support without overlapping entries. Identify who supplied the work and its source record. Do not count all new-worker hours as lost or add the same vacancy effect once as idle time and again as reduced output.
  3. Keep estimates and money transparent. Label uncertain gap or rework attribution and use explicit valuation assumptions. Separate recorded payroll or invoices from an illustrative hours valuation. Explain costs that remain outside the record, such as schedule effects, rather than presenting an incomplete sum as the total financial consequence.
  4. Invite appropriate voluntary feedback. Use the employer's approved private process and explain its purpose. Avoid collecting unnecessary personal details or circulating named reasons to the crew. Federal OPC guidance stresses limited workplace information and access while distinguishing employee jurisdiction; confirm the law and arrangements that apply to this employer.
  5. Choose a response within actual authority. Review repeated concerns alongside other evidence and involve the responsible company roles. A clearer advance-notice process or better receiving plan may be suitable. Name its owner and review what changed; avoid promising retention or treating one person's explanation as a proven verdict on a supervisor.

Common mistakes

  • Applying an unsupported several-hundred-hour average.
  • Double-counting vacancy or mentor effects.
  • Calling all replacement work a loss.
  • Publishing named exit reasons or treating them as proven universal causes.

Checklist

The turnover record should distinguish

  • Defined role, period and accounting boundary.
  • Actual additional hours and direct expenses.
  • Estimates, assumptions and omitted effects.
  • Approved voluntary feedback and protected access.
  • An owned response with a meaningful review.

Check your understanding

The replacement works forty productive hours. Should all forty be added to turnover loss because the person is new?

Show the answer
No. Separate productive contribution from additional recruitment, training, support or measured gap effects. Use consistent boundaries and avoid overlap. A defensible record makes uncertainty visible instead of inflating every new-worker hour into a loss.

Sources

  1. Privacy in the WorkplaceOffice of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada · Federal workplace-information guidance with explicit employee-jurisdiction limits; applicable employer law and arrangements govern · accessed